Contact Us   •   About Us   •   Advertise   •   Sitemap   Subscriber Services   •   Skagit Valley Herald E-Edition  
   
 News
      Search goskagit:        
Skyline residents question property assessments

Marta Murvosh
Skagit Valley Herald
March 26, 2008 - 04:00 PM


Comments (12)   |   Email Story   |   Print Story   |   Share This Story: [?] del.icio.us Digg Google Bookmarks NewsVine StumbleUpon YahooMyWeb
Click image to enlarge.
Colette Weeks
Water views — like this one from the 2400 block of Highland Drive — are part of the reason that property values in the Skyline community of Anacortes have soared in recent years. These homes have a view of Skyline Marina and Burrows Bay.
ADVERTISEMENT:
ANACORTES — When property appraisals hit the mailboxes in Skyline last fall, many residents said they were shocked — some discovered their property tax bills had doubled.

Moreover, a comparison of the values of about 250 properties in the Skyline area by three members of a property owners association revealed a number of anomalies and a pattern of dramatic jumps in assessed value over the past five years.

The comparison by the members of the Skyline Beach Club prompted the club’s board to ask elected officials to attend a community meeting Tuesday night to explain why the increases were so large.

County commissioners Sharon Dillon and Don Munks, and county Chief Deputy Assessor Wesley Hagen attended the meeting. Hagen stood in for Assessor Mark Leander, who did not attend for health reasons.

About 90 Skyline residents packed the Skyline Beach Club to hear what the officials had to say. At least 28 people asked questions.

“What we want to know is: Why are we in the west end getting hit so hard?” resident Dorothy Matson asked.

Over the past five years, property values in Skyline have jumped an average of 204 percent, with the largest jump of 29 percent coming from 2006 to 2007, according to the committee’s figures.

Elsewhere in Skagit County, waterfront property and neighborhoods with expensive real estate, such as Cap Sante in Anacortes and Eaglemont in Mount Vernon, had much lower increases.

“It’s our opinion, based on this study, that the Assessor’s Office needs to go back and do some homework,” said Frank Higgins, past president of the beach club and chairman of the committee that looked at the assessments. “We’re certainly able to provide all the homework. It should be easy for the Assessor’s Office to go check.”

Reggie Caton’s lot is valued at $60,000 more than a neighbor’s with the same view. He wondered why his property was appraised for more than neighbors with similar property.

Hagen said he couldn’t answer questions about specific properties because he didn’t have the information with him Tuesday.

Dillon told audience members she hadn’t expected such a large gathering and intense concern.

“I apologize to each and every one of you,” Dillon said. “My intention was not to bring (Hagen) here and throw him to the wolves and let you go home frustrated.”

Dillon and Hagen promised that they would meet with the beach club committee to go over their research. She said the Assessor’s Office and the commissioners would report back to the community sometime over the next several weeks.

On Tuesday, Hagen explained the appraisal process and provided some reasons for the higher property tax bills.

Part of the increase, he explained, is the result of the passage of several tax levies. Anacortes voters approved levies for an expansion at Island Hospital, for Anacortes School District operations costs, and for the re-authorization of a countywide emergency services levy that pays for ambulances.

“We have many men and women living here on fixed incomes — retired military personnel and government workers,” resident Eddie Griffin said. “What are you going to do? Tax us out of our homes? It’s constant. Many of these people are over 65 years of age. We can’t continue to take a hit like that year after year.”

Hagen said it’s likely the Assessor’s Office has probably erred in some of its assessments in Skyline.

“I have no doubt that we’ve made one or two (mistakes), more like one or two hundred,” Hagen said.

* Marta Murvosh can be reached at 360-416-2149 or .

1055
More from news
Most Recent

Most Commented

Most Read



Report Violation Posted by dajo1971  on  March 26, 2008 - 08:03 PM

Just goes to show us all how expensive the infiltration of the out of state retirees has impacted us all. Too bad the greedy developers and real estate agents could not be required to offset the property tax escalation! The common working person is being priced into poverty and extinction!

Report Violation Posted by fullmain  on  March 27, 2008 - 07:16 AM

Don’t blame the developers and real estate agents for satisfying the demand for homes in Anacortes. But do blame the county for trying to cash in on the popularity of Anacortes. It’s not just Skyline that’s been highly re-assessed—it’s all of Anacortes.

Report Violation Posted by dajo1971  on  March 27, 2008 - 12:44 PM

Reply to fullmain:

My wife is lifetime resident and I have lived here since 1971. My property valuation has multiplied five times the original cost and thus I have paid the brunt of the increased taxes as well. I live in “Old Town” and have seen the developers and realtors force the issue in Planning Meetings and City Council Meetings.
Yes, the County assesses the property value, but that is driven by the City Council allowing the developers and Realtors to dictate policy. They lobbied for getting their desires met.
Planning and zoning within the city is and has been done by these elected officials at the urging of the developers and realtors, not necessarily the long time residents wherever they reside in Anacortes.

Report Violation Posted by fullmain  on  March 27, 2008 - 01:21 PM

dajo, I can only imagine what you’ve seen happen to property values in Anacortes since 1971, and I’m sympathetic. Everybody property owner in Anacortes who has been here a while has become “real-estate rich” thanks to higher property values. My complaint is that the county seems eager to catch up all at once, and I illustrate this with my 2007 re-assessment that says the land value under my 1920’s cottage went up 110% in a single year.The same re-assessment gave the cottage building a 37% increase, again in a single year. I just hope I can get those prices if and when I sell.

Report Violation Posted by dajo1971  on  March 27, 2008 - 01:49 PM

fullmain, we can both hope on that one, but unfortunately, don’t bet on it the way things are going!

Report Violation Posted by dajo1971  on  March 27, 2008 - 01:51 PM

fullmain, another question to ask is, when was the last time someone from the assessor’s office actually talked to the property owners and made an onsite assessment?

Report Violation Posted by retnfo  on  March 30, 2008 - 10:04 AM

State law requires assessors to physically reassess property at least every six years.  That doesn’t mean they have to tour the interior but they are supposed to come to the property site and look around.  My information is that they tend to do it by areas, such as commercial districts one year, industrial the next, and so on.  That could explain why you see large jumps in one sector or area but not in others in a given year.  And big increas in assessed value don’t necessarily mean more taxes.  But, big bonds voted for, do.  To get to the Assessor’s web site, go here:

http://www.skagitcounty.net/Common/asp/default.asp?d=Assessor&c=General&p=faq.htm

Report Violation Posted by dajo1971  on  March 30, 2008 - 01:22 PM

No assessor has contacted me in the last 15 years. That does not mean they have not looked here, but have not seen anyone on the property or had them knock and ask questions or identify themselves.

Report Violation Posted by retnfo  on  March 30, 2008 - 03:19 PM

dajo, I’ve never seen one either in 22 years in the same house.  Sounds like it’s a legitimate question to ask the Assessor.

Ultimately, what they’re going to tell you is that they base their assessments on lot size, home size, age, condition, amenities, and recent sales of comparable properties in the general area.  They also factor in value of improvements made which I think they track via permits.  They also say they do “statistical” adjustments to assessed values during those years when they don’t actually visit the property.

Please bear in mind that I’m not defending them.  I don’t like my assessments any better than anyone else.  I’m just telling you what I’ve been told (by them) many times.

Report Violation Posted by dajo1971  on  March 31, 2008 - 12:59 PM

retnfo,
Thank you for sharing the information.
Too bad “We the People” do not take back our government and make it be by the people instead of the select elete!

Report Violation Posted by scrugg  on  April 09, 2008 - 12:46 PM

Them assessors are getting out of control when the greens are getting out of whack! I would send them north past the border!

Report Violation Posted by scrugg  on  April 09, 2008 - 12:50 PM

I think it meant “for the people” and not “by the people”


Page 1 of 1      

Have something to say? Add your comment!

You must be a logged in member in order to comment.
Don't have an account? Sign up here. It's simple and free!



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?











ADVERTISEMENT:
  © 2007 Skagit Valley Publishing Company Privacy Policy | Terms of Use