Contact Us   •   About Us   •   Advertise   •   Sitemap   Subscriber Services   •   Skagit Valley Herald E-Edition  
RE Weekly Open House Map    
 News
      Search goskagit:        
Survey finds support for Skagit PUD electrical service

Josh Lintereur
Skagit Valley Herald
April 22, 2008 - 08:00 PM


Comments (21)   |   Email Story   |   Print Story   |   Share This Story: [?] del.icio.us Digg Google Bookmarks NewsVine StumbleUpon YahooMyWeb
ADVERTISEMENT:
An overwhelming majority of Skagit County voters would rather get their electricity from a community-owned utility than from an internationally owned power provider, according to phone survey results released Tuesday by the Skagit County Public Utilities District.

The poll of 300 registered Skagit County voters, conducted in March by EMC Research of Seattle, found that 79 percent favored public ownership of their electrical utility. PUD officials commissioned the poll to aid in their deliberations on whether to launch an electricity venture that would supplant the county’s current power provider, Puget Sound Energy.

The PUD — which provides water to about 60 percent of Skagit County’s residents — began considering the venture earlier this year at the urging of residents and business owners who are concerned about PSE’s impending sale to the Macquarie Consortium, a privately held international investment group.

The $7.4 billion acquisition was approved last week by shareholders and received a preliminary OK from federal regulators. The deal still requires state approval.

Based on the survey results, it appears that the PSE sale hasn’t been widely followed by voters, but most would prefer their local PUD as their electricity provider over PSE’s new owners.

Results showed that 69 percent of voters don’t know that PSE is being acquired, and 67 percent were indifferent to the matter once they’d learned of it.

But after being told that PSE’s sale means that the utility would be owned by international investors, 79 percent said they’d rather see PSE replaced by a community-owned utility.

In addition, 67 percent said they’d prefer local ownership to Bellevue-based PSE’s current corporate structure.

The PUD commissioners learned of the survey results during their meeting Tuesday and said the information will be an important factor in determining what to do next.

“In order for use to make an informed decision going forward it was important to get this information,” Commissioner Robbie Robertson said. “I don’t know if it means we can make a determination yet.”

The residents and business owners who’ve asked the PUD to consider becoming an electricity provider worry that PSE’s proposed sale will bring less transparency and accountability to PSE, which had been publicly-traded. They’d also like to see local control over Skagit County’s power resources.

If the PUD decided to offer electricity, it could negotiate a purchase of PSE’s Skagit County properties. Even if PSE was unwilling to sell, the PUD could force the issue as state law allows public utilities to use eminent domain to condemn, buy or acquire privately-owned properties and facilities.

The PUD’s next move should come after it completes a feasibility study, which should wrap up by late May.

So far, PUD officials are frustrated by what they consider a lack of cooperation on PSE’s part in providing data for the study. In March, the PUD requested information on things like infrastructure location, building values, customer demand and maintenance costs.

PSE declined to provide any information, saying in a letter dated April 14 that some of the information is proprietary or confidential, and it’s not in their customers’ best interest to provide detailed records to the PUD.

PUD officials hope that study will help them determine whether to bring the matter before voters, who could decide as early as November on whether to give the PUD authority to provide electricity.

• Josh Lintereur can be reached at 360-416-2141 or at .


468
More from news
Most Recent

Most Commented

Most Read



Report Violation Posted by Power to the People  on  April 22, 2008 - 09:42 PM

When I think about the incompetent mess that the federal government has become, I’m left to conclude that we must, locally, taken care of ourselves.  No one is looking out for us, and the thought of a foreign private equity fund taking over our local power supply ought to scare us stiff.  We’re about to become a third world country.

I also think about the fact that the County PUDs along the Columbia River in Eastern Washington have been providing safe and reliable power at below-market rates for many generations now.  The community’s taxpayers—not some shady foreign private equity fund—owns the electrical system. 

PUD:  What are you waiting for?

Report Violation Posted by Power to the People  on  April 22, 2008 - 09:48 PM

It will be a tough fight, though.  No doubt PSE’s top brass stand to cash in bigtime if the Macquarie sale goes through, and will fight like rabid weasels.

And check out the number of congressmen who take big bucks from PSE...so expect no help from Congress. 

Then again, look how the feds have managed Iraq and our economy.  With friends like that....

Report Violation Posted by walker  on  April 23, 2008 - 11:14 AM

Interesting that the poll didn’t provide any information about what it would COST for the PUD to take over for PSE.  Think millions, tens of millions of dollars, just for starters, to acquire assets.  More millions to assemble the trucks, train the people, build the bureaucracy, etc., and be on call for outages 24/7/365.  And after we’ve spent all that through higher taxes, what will we have?  Maybe a system as reliable as today.  Maybe.  But with this current PUD?  Highly unlikely.  When have you ever seen government take over something and provide better service more cheaply?

Report Violation Posted by Power to the People  on  April 23, 2008 - 11:44 AM

walker: yes, actually, we have seen it work out better when the power was owned by a public PUD.  The Columbia River PUDs took over private power in various cases because the local citizenry was getting gouged and the profits exported.  Tell the truth Walker, you are an employee of PUD who stands to line your pockets with the future of the good people of Skagit County, selling us out to foreign corporate raiders.  Quisling.

Report Violation Posted by richiem999  on  April 23, 2008 - 01:29 PM

“Power”:  Isn’t that just they way—call others’ names when they disagree with you.  Those Columbia River PUDs were formed MANY years ago.  there hasn’t been an electric PUD formed in Washington in 60 years.  I don’t know who Walker works for (not the PUD as you suggest, though I’m sure you meant PSE).  But he makes good points.  Don’t forget it was the PUBLIC power folks who gave us WPPSS.

By the way, “power”, I noticed you didn’t adress Walker’s cost issue.  Nor the ineptness of the current PUD, which can’t even deliver what it already has on its plate.

Report Violation Posted by walker  on  April 23, 2008 - 02:32 PM

Thanks Richie.  You’re right, I’m not an employee of the PUD or PSE, I just call them as I see them.  And I think this gambit to create an electric PUD is more of a powerbuilding than a powerproviding exercise.  The PUD has stars in its eyes.  Their consultant will say this is a great idea because, after all, the consultant is a member of numerous public power associations.  But when it all comes down to it we would all be paying far more for, at best, equal service.

Report Violation Posted by Don Johnson  on  April 24, 2008 - 03:36 AM

Walker, why don’t you call ’em as you see ’em at a Tuesday afternoon PUD meeting? That goes for you, too, richiem999. Come tell the PUD commissioners and the manager about their ineptness. I’m certain that they will beg for your forgiveness.... or something like that.

Report Violation Posted by Saheeb  on  April 24, 2008 - 05:40 PM

First of all, PSE was already owned by many foreign investors, whether being foreign to our state or country. They are a publicly traded company.

Second: The new owners can’t charge rates that are any higher than the WUTC would allow. Electricity is a regulated industry. The WUTC regualates the intrastate electric rates, and the FERC regulates interstate and wholesale rates.

Report Violation Posted by Saheeb  on  April 24, 2008 - 05:44 PM

Any time an electric utility wants to increase rates, they must submit to the WUTC, which then triggers a rate case. During the rate case there are many interveners who can also argue why there should not be a rate increase. Most retail customers are represented by their state’s attorney general.

Report Violation Posted by Saheeb  on  April 24, 2008 - 05:51 PM

The electric industry is a capital intensive industry, so capital intensive that it is considered a natural monopoly, thus regulated by state and federal government. Regulation is considered a taking under the takings clause of the constitution, and that makes the electric companies able to receive just compensation through rates which help them recover their capital costs and earn a return on equity or just and reasonble profit.

Report Violation Posted by Saheeb  on  April 24, 2008 - 05:59 PM

Skagit PUD and everyone who believes they would be better off with the PUD running the electric industry in Skagit County should think very hard about this.

Your rates will not change because of new ownership. (Washington has some of the lowest rates in the nation as far as the energy charges are concerned, averaging somewhere between 6 to 6.5 cents per kwh)

Report Violation Posted by Saheeb  on  April 24, 2008 - 06:03 PM

The Skagit Valley Herald has reported very poorly on this issue and whipped everyoned into a frenzy over the sale of PSE. Nothing will change. The new owners will still be required to provide safe and reliable service at regulated rates.

Report Violation Posted by richiem999  on  April 25, 2008 - 07:56 AM

I also think the PUD may be a bit disingenuous in creating the impression that people throughout the county are completely buying this idea.  From what I heard of their “focus groups,” it was the PUD, not the participants, who really pushed the idea.  Secondly, the phone survey was biased—it was like asking people “how would you like a new car” without telling them they had to pay for it or what it would cost.

Report Violation Posted by walker  on  April 25, 2008 - 07:59 AM

I think people in this county are smarter than the PUD gives them credit for—they will see this is just a “power trip” that will cost them big time.

Report Violation Posted by Irtnog  on  April 25, 2008 - 09:23 AM

Yeah, before you know it they’ll be putting fluoride in our electricity.

Report Violation Posted by scrugg  on  April 29, 2008 - 09:20 PM

No to PUD’s power servicing plan - they cant even handle their water problems!

Report Violation Posted by tankeryanker  on  April 30, 2008 - 06:28 AM

How is 79% of 300 people polled “an overwhelming majority of Skagit County voters”?  That sounds like an incredibly small sample to me.  I, for one, would oppose a PUD simply from the watching storm restoration efforts of Snohomish PUD.  Camano Island residents suffer long and hard during storms whereas PSE does a pretty good job of restoring service out here in the rural part of the county.  Their right of way maintenance efforts last summer paid off during this past storm season resulting in only one minor outage.  If Skagit PUD wants to provide me service, give me water, sewer, and natural gas.  I already have electrical service, so leave it alone.

Report Violation Posted by richiem999  on  April 30, 2008 - 08:37 AM

This story is another example of today’s “journalism” in which a reporter grabs only those snippets of information to build a story that justifies an agenda.  Look at ALL the survey results, especially those the repoter chose to leave out—PSE received a favorable rating of 70%, the PUD 61%; 88% approved of the job PSE does in providing electrical service, and 84% approved of their efforts to resore power after storms.  Before being asked loaded questions about ownership of PSE, 46% said they wouldn’t switch to another utility if they had a choice, 29% said they would switch and 25% said they didn’t know. 

MOST IMPORTANT, people taking this poll were told NOTHING about what it would cost for the PUD to take over electricity service from PSE.

Report Violation Posted by richiem999  on  April 30, 2008 - 08:38 AM

What do you think the results would be if people were told the truth—that it will cost tens of millions, and more likely hundreds of millions of dollars, and at the end of the day they will likely pay higher rates and have poorer service.

The PUD can “spin” this all they want, but this gambit of theirs is all about empire building and power GRABBING, and the people of Skagit County will pay dearly if they get sucked in.  Count on it.

Report Violation Posted by Don Johnson  on  April 30, 2008 - 10:51 PM

Why don’t you show up for a PUD Commissioners’ meeting some Tuesday afternoon and bounce your concerns off of the manager, commissioners, and staff instead of spouting off in the relative safety of this forum?

Report Violation Posted by scrugg  on  May 06, 2008 - 10:15 PM

the svh survey is wrong!!!


Page 1 of 1      

Have something to say? Add your comment!

You must be a logged in member in order to comment.
Don't have an account? Sign up here. It's simple and free!



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?











ADVERTISEMENT:
  © 2007 Skagit Valley Publishing Company Privacy Policy | Terms of Use