Contact Us   •   About Us   •   Advertise   •   Sitemap   Subscriber Services   •   Skagit Valley Herald E-Edition  
   
 News
      Search goskagit:        
Vigil held to mark 5 years of war

Franny White
Skagit Valley Herald
March 20, 2008 - 02:00 PM


Comments (40)   |   Email Story   |   Print Story   |   Share This Story: [?] del.icio.us Digg Google Bookmarks NewsVine StumbleUpon YahooMyWeb
Click image to enlarge.
Scott Terrell
Peace vigil attendees leave Democratic headquarters in Mount Vernon after a discussion on the Iraq War Wednesday.
Additional Images:   Click images to enlarge

ADVERTISEMENT:
MOUNT VERNON — A group of peace activists gathered in downtown Mount Vernon five years ago, holding silent vigil against a just-started war in Iraq.

They were at it again Wednesday night. A group of about 40 joined war protesters across the nation Wednesday night and marked the five-year anniversary of the Iraq War. The local group held candles at dusk and sang “We Shall Overcome” at the corner of South First and West Division streets for nearly an hour.

“I can’t believe I’m here again,” one protester said as the group sat in a circle an hour beforehand to share their thoughts on the war.

Thinking back five years, many in the group sat solemnly and said they were saddened by the government’s 2003 decision to go to war.

“I was hoping we could stop this thing from going to an invasion,” said Howard Mantle of Mount Vernon. “Millions of people of the world came out and said ‘don’t invade Iraq’ and what happened?”

Some angrily recalled then-Secretary of State Colin Powell’s February 2003 speech to the United Nations, where Powell said former Iraqi ruler Saddam Huessein had weapons of mass destruction. No such weapons have been found in Iraq.

One older man wearing a baseball cap that read “Korean War” was among those opposing the war in Iraq.

“I didn’t spend 14 months in Korea for the kind of garbage we got today,” said the man, Tom Day of Sedro-Woolley. “What bothers me the most is the dishonesty in the government.”

Others were upset the war had lasted so long and called for a military pullout.

“It just needs to end immediately,” said John M. Smith of Clear Lake. “We’ve got ourselves in a huge mess.”

One woman said it was important to keep the public aware of the ongoing war.

“I think we really all need to stand up, and not just today, but say Iraq is really important to us ... we’re not letting it go,’ said Carmen Werder of the Blanchard area.

Lynn Pokela of Camano Island encouraged the group to remain hopeful for the future.

As the group walked toward their protest corner, they passed black model caskets stood that outside their downtown meeting room Wednesday night. A sign taped onto one casket read “Casualties 3,990.” Someone noted one more American soldier had died in Iraq since the sign was painted that morning.

The group assembled and began the first round of song. Deymian Lesar of La Conner held an American flag with one hand and made a two-fingered peace sign with the other.

* Franny White can be reached at 360-416-2148 or .

953
More from news
Most Recent

Most Commented

Most Read



Report Violation Posted by desimo  on  March 25, 2008 - 01:50 PM

I so appreciate your correcting my numbers.  Now could you please explain how ~7500 service persons were killed under Clinton without even a war?  Very possibly the idea of him; one who protested Vietnam and basically was a traitor to his own country; being Commander and Chief lead the Service people to mass suicide!

Report Violation Posted by Lee_USA  on  March 25, 2008 - 05:07 PM

How do you ‘finish’ an occupation?  An illegal occupation based on a pack of lies to boot?

Those Iraqis thanking US soldiers are also asking them to go home and let THEM take care of their OWN country.  Too many Americans see Iraqis are children unable to work or control their own nation.....pure western biased bulloney.

Report Violation Posted by Lee_USA  on  March 25, 2008 - 05:08 PM

ps....the 1.2 million Iraqi refugees would like to come home too.

Report Violation Posted by Lee_USA  on  March 25, 2008 - 05:11 PM

desimo,

diverting attention from the Miserable Failure aka Bush?

Bush started his invasion and occupation with a pack of lies.  Lies that included being out of Iraq as soon as Saddam was captured.  Bush lies with impunity.

Report Violation Posted by desimo  on  March 25, 2008 - 07:12 PM

Oh, not diverting anything.  Just wanted to keep thing correct.  You dems are quick to demonize Bush because of the ‘massive killing of our troops’.  In reality, you all don’t give a rat’s ### about the troops.  You just like any possible cause to critize anything possibly Republican.  You even do so to the closing of your eyes to worst things done by Dems in office.  You dems don’t care a bit about the country as long as you have opportunity to complain.  At least be real!

Report Violation Posted by Manerva  on  March 26, 2008 - 09:17 AM

Right on Desimo.  As if democrats (or ANY politician fir that matter) don’t lie to further their own agendas.

Report Violation Posted by watch dog  on  March 26, 2008 - 10:06 AM

I vote the person and not party, but admittedly lean Republican.  Especially this last election where I felt I had to in order to maintain balance on the Supreme Court.  It is funny how some ‘usually Dems’ are so non-tolerant of the other party.  I’m just waiting to hear the first reference to the nasty politicking occuring in the democratic nomination is somehow being perpetrated by Republicans.

Report Violation Posted by Manerva  on  March 26, 2008 - 11:12 AM

I TOTALLY agree watch dog.

Report Violation Posted by Lee_USA  on  March 27, 2008 - 09:25 AM

“In reality, you all don’t give a rat’s ### about the troops”

So, who’s making wild assumptions here?  Are you assuming that all the soldiers who died in Iraq are Republicans?  That the grieving families of those dead soldiers are all Republicans?

Closing OUR eyes?  What’s worse than abusing our soldiers by sending them off to occupy another country based on a pack of lies? 

I await your response.

Report Violation Posted by *shrug*  on  March 27, 2008 - 11:10 AM

And let’s not forget the kind of medical help these veterans have been getting either.  When an administration in power claims to “support the troops” I expect them to PROVE it, and they have proven the exact opposite by forcing them to serve longer and repeated tours, and providing shoddy health care.  For shame.

Report Violation Posted by Manerva  on  March 27, 2008 - 12:35 PM

Man....I’m just agreeing with everybody...right on *shrug.* RIGHT ON RIGHT ON.  My Dad is a vet and he’s getting good healtcare (albeit slow) so I have to hope this is possible for ALL of our soldiers.

Report Violation Posted by kim  on  March 29, 2008 - 12:47 PM

To Watchdog, Thank you for the post of 3/24, great insight.

To LaCanner, You didn’t answer the question. “As for the majority of that country hating us..have you been there or getting your facts from CNN?”

To Lee_USA, Do the refugees want to come home or go home?  You’ve confused me.

To all, Please don’t get defensive.  We’re trying to have an intelligent conversation here.  That is impossible to have when participants carry around a chip-on-their-shoulder.

Report Violation Posted by *shrug*  on  March 31, 2008 - 02:59 PM

Kim, your question to Lee has confused me!  “Do the refugees want to come home or go home?” Is this an either or question?  Lee states above “ps....the 1.2 million Iraqi refugees would like to come home too.” What is confusing about that statement?

Report Violation Posted by kim  on  April 13, 2008 - 04:59 PM

Shrug, “Iraqi refugees would like to come home,” if Lee is in the U.S., then he is stating that the refugees are outside of the U.S. and want to come here. I’m thinking that maybe the refugees are outside of Iraq and want to go home to Iraq. “To come,” is to join us where we are. “To go,” is to leave where we are with a destination elsewhere. I’m just trying to understand where the refugees are & where they want to go.

Report Violation Posted by *shrug*  on  April 13, 2008 - 07:59 PM

No, kim, Lee is talking about the REFUGEES’ homes.  Meaning, where they are taking refuge FROM.  I get that the “go” vs. “come” muddles things up a bit, but I believe the meaning of the statement was quite clear.  Honestly, I’m confused at how THIS became a worthwhile debate.  I guess I’m to blame for some of that, though.  :)


Page 2 of 2        <  1 2

Have something to say? Add your comment!

You must be a logged in member in order to comment.
Don't have an account? Sign up here. It's simple and free!



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?











ADVERTISEMENT:
  © 2007 Skagit Valley Publishing Company Privacy Policy | Terms of Use