Contact Us   •   About Us   •   Advertise   •   Sitemap   Subscriber Services   •   Skagit Valley Herald E-Edition  
   
 Opinion
      Search goskagit:        


Courier-Times Letters to the Editor| March 26

Courier Times
March 26, 2008 - 01:00 PM


Comments (18)   |   Email Story   |   Print Story   |   Share This Story: [?] del.icio.us Digg Google Bookmarks NewsVine StumbleUpon YahooMyWeb
ADVERTISEMENT:
Deluxe facility raises concerns

We are very disturbed about the possibility of a recycling facility near the Sedro-Woolley High School and close proximity to a historical neighborhood and historical downtown. We have gone before the City Council and voiced our concerns and objections, which are:

Location — The facility is to be located directly across from the high school tennis courts. Tennis matches are held just following school and from what I can remember about this sport, it’s a fairly quiet game. From the information that has been published regarding this recycling center, the hours of operation are from 7 or 8 a.m. to roughly 9 p.m. at night. They will be operating front loaders and trucks and cars will be visiting the area continually during these hours. When parents go to watch their kids compete on the football field or at a track event, will we be able to hear the announcer?

Traffic — Eventually, all or most of the Skagit County recycling will be brought to our town. Endless lines of garbage trucks rumbling down our city streets — isn’t this a nice thought?
Air quality — Diesel truck exhaust and increased car traffic will affect the town’s air quality.
Reputation — The Sedro-Woolley High School classes of the 1940s and ’50s still refer to Riverfront Park as the “city dump.” Do we really want our children to be known as the high school by the dump? Gateway to Garbage City will be our new city slogan. Do we really want 28 tons of solid waste in the downtown area?

Last, but certainly not least, is the fact that our property values in the surrounding neighborhood will decrease, as who in their right mind wants to live on top of a recycling center?

Bob and Sally Carlson
Sedro-Woolley


Citizens should speak up

As a concerned citizen of Sedro-Woolley I’m writing this letter to express my thoughts about a garbage recycling plant being planned to start up on property within our city limits. Especially since this property is next to our high school. Just imagine the noise and confusion this will create to our students coming and going during the day and for extra activities after school. So many trucks coming and going all the time.

Also, the noise and traffic for the residents living near this proposed facility.

Who would ever want their town to become known as the garbage dump for the Northwest? Let’s encourage business to fill our empty buildings downtown instead of the above mentioned garbage recycle project. Surely there is a more suitable acreage for this to happen than in city limits and next to our school and family homes? Many other people that I have talked to agree with me on this position. In fact, I haven’t spoken to even one resident around here that doesn’t feel the same way about this situation.

Please people of Sedro-Woolley, if you are against the idea of a garbage recycling plant in our city let your voices be heard. Do we as tax payers have no say in these matters?

Ruth Grose
Sedro-Woolley


Deluxe trucks too much

Picture this Sedro-Woolley.

Long lines of garbage trucks and pickups with garbage on State Route 20 between Sedro-Woolley and Burlington. And the same long lines along State Route 9 from Sedro-Woolley to Clear Lake. Traffic congestion at the State Route 9 turnoff into Jameson Street as we wait for masses of garbage trucks to turn.

The noise of trucks backing up until 9 p.m. each night — and we aren’t talking one or two trucks — we’re talking hundreds of loads a day as Deluxe gets garbage from all of Skagit County, as well as Whatcom County. This needs to be a huge operation for it to make money.
Sound carries throughout this town. The Sedro-Woolley High School band practices and the Fourth of July festivities can be heard all the way out and beyond the eastern city limits. But at least these are happy sounds.

This isn’t just about the neighborhoods adjacent to the garbage site. This is about everyone in this community. It affects the high school, the downtown corridor, the highways, the streets. It affects the perception of our town from the point of view of tourists, and also the desirability of this community as a place to live.

Perception is everything. I still hear comments like “Oh, Sedro-Woolley? Isn’t that where that mental institution is?” But of course “nuthouse” is the favorite word.

There was a huge window of opportunity for the city to step in before the building permit application came in and stop this process. Eron Berg has stated that once the application came in there wasn’t anything anybody could do. The city had a chance to nix this deal months ahead of the application — but what did they do instead? They wrote a city resolution to accept Deluxe’s business idea “in concept” months before the application arrived. Mike and Eron had their arms wide open encouraging this disaster.

This isn’t a case of NIMBY — not in my back yard. It’s a case of NIMFY — not in my front yard.

It’s time for all Sedro-Woolley citizens to speak up. Get your protests in to the city. The time is now.

Shelley Carroll
Sedro-Woolley


No dump in Woolley

I also live in the neighborhood on Nelson Street. Approximately two years ago I inquired about buying that property so I could relocate my aerospace fabrication business here from Arlington airport. I called the real estate agent and was told a sale was pending, that it “was a done deal.” I figured Janicki Industries was involved, I never ever thought a dump — I mean a ‘deluxe’ dump was in the works.

This is what happens when people vote boneheads into office. It seems to me that the land in question would make a better industrial park than a foul smelly and nasty dump?

It’s really a sad day for Sedro-Woolley.

I guess the jobs the city attorney and mayor are pushing are better for the town, such as dump pickers and garbage sorters than aerospace workers.

Roger Kindler
Sedro-Woolley


Garbage plan is questionable

I recently learned of the plan to develop a large garbage dump approximately two blocks from Sedro-Woolley High School. This has caused me to question this decision for several reasons.

One is the audacity of the entire plan. I looked up the word audacity in Webster’s Dictionary and it states: audacity…1., boldness or daring, esp., with confident or arrogant disregard for personal safety, conventional thought, or other restrictions; nerve. If this garbage dump would be developed within the city limits of Sedro-Woolley, this would be a sad commentary on the quality of life in this lovely town.

The next reason is the unfairness of the plan. This relates to the children, teachers and staff that work and attend Sedro-Woolley High School and the property owners in the vicinity.
I looked up the word garbage in the dictionary. It states: 1. Discarded animal and vegetable matter, as from a kitchen, refuse. 2. Any matter that is no longer wanted or needed: trash. 3. Anything that is contemptibly worthless, inferior, or vile.

Our children, property owners and this city deserve better.

Bonnie Lang
La Conner
(SWHS Class of 1957)

More from opinion
Most Recent

Most Commented

Most Read



Report Violation  Posted by Brett Sandström  on  March 26, 2008 - 02:59 PM

Sedro-Woolley City Officials... you are making many people unhappy. You are the directors of our fair city and you should have steered this facility to another location. Lets hope your "deal-breaker" (MDNS requirements) work, because this situation will weigh in the minds of your constituents many-many years to come.
Report Violation  Posted by dan litton  on  March 28, 2008 - 01:16 PM

Brett, How do you tell someone they can not use their property the way they want to if it is zoned for it? You should know being on the planning commisson that you have to abide by the laws not how you "feel." If you make judgement by how you "feel" you could cost the citizens of Sedro-Woolley money via a lawsuit from not following the laws.. The allowed uses in zoning usually starts at planning commission Brett, what happened? Maybe the Sedro-Woolley planning commision should hurry up and change the rules in the middle of game like the County did on Solid Waste Comp Plan - See lawsuit filed by Deluxe 3/27/08. All costs us poor taxpayers.
Report Violation  Posted by Brett Sandström  on  March 28, 2008 - 02:23 PM

This was in works before I came on board, and since it is an allowable use, it would have never come before us anyway. The reason I am on the planning commission is, in some way, to help preserve the aesthetic appeal of our small town through sustainable and responsible planning, that in turn, will allow things such this proposed waste station, but only in the proper locations.
The location is key in all my arguments. This is purely a case of right idea, wrong location. And as a concerned resident of the nearby neighborhoods, I will be vocal in my opposition to this travesty.
This is something that City of Sedro-Woolley should have rezoned a long time ago to prevent something like a dump from going in across the street from the Sedro-Woolley High School.
Report Violation  Posted by dan litton  on  March 28, 2008 - 03:34 PM

Your answer is the same one being used by the mayor and city council - it's an allowable use. I here there are other industrial sites in the city but wouldn't the "dump/transfer station" impact those neighborhoods too? Maybe, Sedro-Woolley should not allow any industry in the city that creates odors, dust, noise, traffic, and health issues. Bye, Bye Janicki Industries and their fiberglass odors. Unfornately, Sedro-Woolley is a old logging mill town where the neighborhoods grew up around the mills and now those mills are the prime industrial sites. To prevent instant replay on this conflict between residents and industrial zoning, Sedro-Woolley should tighten up what kind of industry should be allowed.
Report Violation  Posted by Brett Sandström  on  March 28, 2008 - 04:01 PM

Sedro-Woolley is the town that logging built, and that site on Jameson was well suited to it’s use in regards to its location near the Skagit River and the rails and road to move lumber. Kids at the high school had family that worked in the mills and they also had a clear-cut future in logging as a career. Once the mills close and the land laid vacant for years, it should have been rezoned for something more suitable to a residential area and school zone.
Report Violation  Posted by Brett Sandström  on  March 28, 2008 - 04:01 PM

I agree with you wholeheartedly, Sedro-Woolley does need to tighten its rules, regulations, and standards to prevent this very thing from happening again and that is why I wanted to be on the Planning Commission. I am new to the commission and I am learning the ropes, which takes time. I not the only one, I have to convey my and communicate my ideas to the rest of the commission for discussion and hopefully action.
Report Violation  Posted by dan litton  on  March 28, 2008 - 04:16 PM

Brett, sound like a plan to me but probably not to the owners of the property who paid big bucks to develop. Sedro-Woolley School District blew it by not buying the property before Deluxe. It was for sale cheap, across street from present high school and we all know the high school needs to expand. And the lowlands could be used for agriculture and natural science classes and sports practice fields. SWSD blew it.
Report Violation  Posted by Brett Sandström  on  March 28, 2008 - 04:30 PM

When I write here on the GoSkagit website I am NOT representing nor speaking for the Sedro-Woolley Planning Commission. In the case of Deluxe’s move into my neighborhood, I write as a free person, expressing my personal concerns to something that I feel is detrimental to my neighborhood and in the current proposed location, my concern for the city as well.
Report Violation  Posted by dan litton  on  March 28, 2008 - 04:35 PM

Brett, you might think that and write that but a proponet on a development could disqualify you from hearing and voting on a project by you voicing your "opinion." It's a fact, jack. Sometimes when you hold office you lose some rights unless you don't take your commission job serious.
Report Violation  Posted by Something Is Rotten In Woolley  on  March 29, 2008 - 10:32 AM

Dan, you mean like Louie Requa should be disqualified because he is handling the Deluxe permit?

At least Brett isn't in Deluxe's pocket like some people and has opinions based on what he thinks is best for the community instead of his personal bank account.
Report Violation  Posted by dan litton  on  March 29, 2008 - 12:26 PM

Requa should not vote on anything specific with Deluxe. Now lets look at County where a commissioner's family trust own land around the current transfer station and he still votes on transfer issues. Conflict big time, my opinion. And a certain prominent family in Woolley files an appeal on Deluxue application and they are competetors with Deluxe. Good for community or their pocketbook? You can find stink in every direction if you try hard enough.
Report Violation  Posted by Something Is Rotten In Woolley  on  March 29, 2008 - 06:06 PM

That business about a conflict of interest by Dahlstedt is pure nonsense pushed by Ray Sizemore and Company. The paper has already covered it two or three times, and it's just smear tactics because Dahlstedt voted against Sizemore's deal with Anderson. He has like some minor interest in land near the County transfer station.

This whole thing is a direct result of the corrupt Cimarron deal where Anderson and Munks cut their pal a giant garbage contract. If money didn't change hands over that, I'll eat my hat.
Report Violation  Posted by Something Is Rotten In Woolley  on  March 29, 2008 - 06:12 PM

By the way, there's no "dan litton" living in Skagit County, at least not according to the phone book.
Report Violation  Posted by Something Is Rotten In Woolley  on  March 29, 2008 - 06:18 PM

Why, Dan Litton, it sounds like you are saying that the Janicki family filed an appeal because they are competing with Deluxe, and not because they are worried about a garbage dump next to our high school.

Did I get that right? How in God's name is Annie Janicki competing with Deluxe?

You're a silly person, dan litton.
Report Violation  Posted by dan litton  on  March 30, 2008 - 10:56 AM

I don't have a land line phone so not in phonebook - see cell phone. Also, I can not find "Something Is Rotten In Rotten" in phonebook either. Acusations can go both ways.
Report Violation  Posted by Brett Sandström  on  April 22, 2008 - 11:25 AM

There is no Dan Litton is Skagit County period. Doing a quick little Skagit County Auditor search there is no Litton associated with a Dan or Daniel or any of the like that is a home-owner in the County. This leads me to my next point, see the second post from the top. Not being a home-owner, “Dan” can’t hold ranks with or hardly cry-out or clamor for the “poor taxpayers” in the county, for he lends no financial support or hardship, however one sees it, to do so.
Report Violation  Posted by dan litton  on  April 22, 2008 - 09:16 PM

Brett, run that by me again.....How about a corporation, LLC, significant other, renter that pays indirect taxes, live in Hawaii, whatever? Boy you are taking this too serious.
Report Violation  Posted by xbrettiex  on  April 24, 2008 - 02:03 PM

Live in Hawaii, then you’re really not supporting our local tax structure. Basically, you living there in Mount Vernon are not adversely affected by this transfer station. Your property value isn’t in jeopardy. Your high school student’s school life won’t be miserable. Your downtown won’t suffer the economic depression of lost tourism. You really have no stake in this debate!

Page 1 of 1      

Have something to say? Add your comment!

You must be a logged in member in order to comment.
Don't have an account? Sign up here. It's simple and free!



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?











ADVERTISEMENT:
  © 2007 Skagit Valley Publishing Company Privacy Policy | Terms of Use