The Washington State Legislature once again is attempting to make government records more obscure, this time by trying to shield public employee birthdates from disclosure with the introduction of HB 1888.

Rep. Zack Hudgins, of the 11th Legislative District and Javier Valdez from the 46 th Legislative district, both Democrats, are the sponsors.

While proponents say they are most concerned with privacy rights and identity theft, this bill is really about a fight between public employee unions and the Freedom Foundation, a conservative think tank that uses public employee databases to inform employees of their option to opt out of union membership.

The unions hate this. In fact, the two groups have been fighting this fight in court for years.

Most recently, employee unions lost an attempt to shield public employees when the State Supreme Court ruled late last year that birthdates are public information. This upholds what has been state law for decades.

Would it really be that bad if public employee birthdates were shielded? Yes.

Birthdates allow people investigating the government to verify identities, confirm those serving the public are who they say they are and distinguish among individuals with similar names. Birthdates have been key in many investigations of government actions. For example:

• An investigative series on coaches showed that community-college administrators in Washington “retired” and then quickly rehired coaches in a way that enabled the coaches to collect both a salary and a pension. The report relied on an analysis of state pension data containing birthdates.

• A story alerted the public that one in 10 Seattle school bus drivers had bad driving or criminal convictions that should have barred them from transporting students. That story depended on public employment records with birthdates.

• Reporting on the disputed 2004 gubernatorial election relied on comparing names and dates of birth from the voter registration database and other sources of public records. Reporters were able to inform the public about voting by felons and deceased voters, and to report on systemic problems with election integrity with a level of detail not possible without birthdate information.

This isn’t about privacy. Dates of birth are included in marriage licenses, records of military service, a license to practice medicine or even licenses to drive a taxi. State law requires it for all registered voters, birth certificates include both the child and parent dates of birth and are public records available from the Department of Health. As a historic, legislative and factual matter, dates of birth have long been a matter of public record.

Public employee unions have ample opportunities to explain the advantages of union membership to public employees. They don’t need to hinder access to public records to do that.

Fred Obee is executive director of the Washington Newspaper Publishers Association.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.